Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Oracle List - by freelists.org
Oracle on SUSE Linux - Runing Oracle on SUSE Linux
Oracle database error code ...
www.freelists.org
Subjects
ORA 12540: TNS:internal limit restriction exceeded
ORA 12838 please : Is possible to append two times to the same table befo
ORA 12838 please : Is possible to append two times to the same table before
ora 04031
ora 12500 on windows
ORA 32004: obsolete and/or deprecated parameter(s) specified
ORA 01925: maximum of 30 enabled roles exceeded
ORA 01925: maximum of 30 enabled roles exceeded
ora 12500 on windows
ORA 01650, one idea
ORA 01650
ORA 4030
ORA 12838 please : Is possible to append two times to thesametable before do
ORA 12838 please : Is possible to append two times to thesame table before d
ORA 01536
ORA 03113 end of file on communication channel
ORA 32004: obsolete and/or deprecated parameter(s) specified
ORA 00600:
ORA 00020: maximum number of processes (%s) exceeded
ORA 01925: maximum of 30 enabled roles exceeded
ORA 3113 while creating a cluster database 9201 RAC on Linux with OCFS
ora 12500 on windows
ora 12500 on windows
ora 12500 on windows
ORA 01650, one idea
ora 12500 on windows
ora 12500 on windows
ora 12500 on windows
ORA 2000 Error Using DBMS STATS GATHER SCHEMA STATS
ORA 01650, one idea
ORA 01650, one idea
ORA 01650, one idea
ORA 01650
ORA 01650
Subject: ora 01031
ORA 4030
ORA 4030
ORA 06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: Bulk Bind: Truncated Bind
Subject: Re: ORA 01722 invalid number
 
Oracle List
Page 365 of 412 Previous 100   Previous 10   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   Next 10  

Re: cache buffers chains & library cache --- latch, latch
   again...

"Gets " and "misses " are not indications of a problem merely that latches are being used. "Sleeps " are more significant indicative that latch waits are taking long enough to require preemptive w

cache buffers chains & library cache --- latch, latch again...

Hi list My database is up since december 2003. However when I go through v$latch I found the following NAME GETS MISSES SLEEPS

DBED/AC version problem: MP2 or MP1+RP3?

hi list friends I installed the patches in DBED/AC MP2 and did a system reboot. Patch name like [root@(protected) mp2]# ls -l total 299872 -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 30657 Aug 6 2003

RMAN Strategy

What is "further then this ". The use RMAN requires that the user that RMAN uses to connect to the database has the role SYSDBA. In particular that means that password file must be set to either sh

Has anyone used 10g Rel 1 with Oracle Names?

> In the process of testing 10g rel 1 I see that neither 'namesctl ' and > associated Onames directories exist nor does it resolve TNS entries unless > made available via tnsnames.ora..... If so

catpatch.sql not applied after database creation on recently updated databas

The damage is minimal if at all. Your partner probably created the database using dbca and one of the templates. That seed db is 92010. To prevent this in the future always check the values from dba_r

catpatch.sql not applied after database creation on recently updated database.

Several weeks ago I updated one of my 9i R2 database servers to the 9.2.0.5.0 patch set and ran all of the necessary scripts on the database after patching the binaries. A partner of mine created

Subject: Import hanging - help!

"Smith Ron L. " wrote > > I have a compressed import hanging. > I found the following code in the system ALTER SESSION SET EVENTS > '22825 TRACE NAME CONTEXT FOREVER LEVEL 1 ' > > I tries tran

Linux Support

Try the -ignoreSysPrereqs option to runInstaller to turn off the OS checks. -----Original Message----- From Ken Payton [mailto Ken.Payton@(protected)] Sent Fri 4/23/2004 4 55 PM To o

Interesting question

Somehow I missed the definition of "COTS "...will someone please enlighten me? Thanks.

RE: Why "Separating Data and Indexes improves performance " is a m
    yth?

The one that comes to mind is a particularly nasty query from a Business Objects (aka "B.O. ") report that runs against our OLTP DB. Did I mention that the vendor ported the schema from VMS RMS file

Subject: UNION ALL breaks analytics?

In 8.1.7.4.0 on HP-UX 11.0 I 've got this table TX_COUNT NUMBER TIMESTAMP DATE (thanks Oracle for making "TIMESTAMP " a reserved word in 9i despite it being used as column names in the DD!)

Why "Separating Data and Indexes improves performance " is a m yth?

On 04/23/2004 02 06 31 PM Tim Gorman wrote > Do you see a lot of FAST FULL scans? Generally when I see them they are > the result of either > > * SELECT COUNT(*) on table with PK (usua

Why "Separating Data and Indexes improves performance " is a myth?

Alas even that isn 't necessarily true. What if you have a low update rate but a high read rate. You 've just isolated a disc or two for a very low level of redo I/O and reduced the number o

Re: Why "Separating Data and Indexes improves performance " is a
   myth?

Jeez Paul it was just an example. ) Jared On Fri 2004-04-23 at 18 15 Paul Drake wrote > OOH - odd number of disks for RAID 0 > > BRAIN HURTS. > > These days I can only do math in my hea

RE: Why "Separating Data and Indexes improves performance " is a m
   yth?

Man I wish I lived in your world... Rich Rich Jesse System/Database Administrator rich.jesse@(protected) QuadTech Sussex WI USA > From Tim Gorman > S

San Diego and Oracle

Is anyone on here live in or near San Diego that can tell me how they like living there and so on and so forth? How expensive is it and what are the DBA pay scales like there in relation to costs?

need some advice(you partition experts out there, this one is for you).

It looks like you need to Create working table as select old data excluding new number year and qtr from old partition Insert append new data into working table. Index work

Re: Why "Separating Data and Indexes improves performance " is
a myth?

The myth is that "they are both accessed at the same time ". They are not. At least not by the same session processing a single sql statement. At 10 13 AM 4/23/2004 you wrote >Hi >Does any one

RE: Why "Separating Data and Indexes improves performance " is a
myth?

It is a myth because the index has to be read first so the rowid for the table can be determined. At that point an I/O for the table can be done. So index reads and their associated tables are fo

Why "Separating Data and Indexes improves performance " is a myth?

And an old truism - which I think I first ran up the flagpole during v6 days 20 inserts might go into just one table block 20 inserts could easily mean 60 scattered index block

anyone using rac on vcs DBED/AC?

Why does the private nic not have an IP? It should . Also ensure thet once the private nic 's have IP 's that the binding order is such that the public IP 's are loaded first. ---- Not necessarily.

Subject: Re: OCP - Hotsos SQL Optimization

Michael I don 't know anything about the mentioned courses I haven 't attended either of them. I do however believe that you should read Cary 's book if you haven 't already done so and get a good

data loading

hi can anybody give me a suggestion regarding this..its related to data loading using sqlldr in a particular filed data is like this.. 12345 23451 34567 i have to load them as 12.345 2

Registry remnants after uninstalling 9.2 on W2K server

I would uninstall again and this time go into the registry and under local machine \ software delete the oracle key. Jeffrey Beckstrom Database Administrator Greater Cleveland Regional Transit A

Re: Antique hunter - looking for info on insert into partion (union-all)
view

I think Michael M?ller from Miracle implemented PV with one of our Support customers and it works nicely. Inserts will have to be guided to the right table/partition by the application or by the in

Oracle collections!

Hello List We are using Oracle collection to pass data to the JDBC. ( MASTER DETAILS RECORDS). CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW prod_offer_view OF master WITH OBJECT id (PROD_OFFER_ID) AS SELECT

Subject: Perl & Open source DBs

Which open source rDBMS is "better " to be used with PERL where the application would involve at most a couple of concurrent users and a probably less than 100MB of data. The application will almos

Informatica Bulk Mode behavior

First guess - they 're using direct load and still loading one row at a time so you get one row per block (or worse). Since you 've got the v$sql entry check executions against rows processed

RE: assistance dropping lost tablespace, contains partitioned tab
   les

Had the (unpleasant) opportunity to do this recently on 817 as described and it did in fact work for me. YMMV. -----Original Message----- From Jonathan Lewis [mailto jonathan@(protected)
Page 365 of 412 Previous 100   Previous 10   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   Next 10