 | | | ORA-4030 | ORA-4030 2004-02-06 - By Paul Drake
Back
--- Jared.Still@(protected) wrote:
> Hi Lisa,
> This sounds very similar to a recent discussion on
> this list.
>
> I believe that the temporary solution was to go back
> to using
> sort_area_size, though I could have it wrong.
>
> Try searching the archives as fatcity.com and
> freelists.org.
>
> Jared
bingo.
it all depends upon how many concurrent users you have
to support.
we have a warehouse server
quad xeon MP
w2k adv svr (w/large memory support enabled 3GT, PAE)
8 GB physical memory
dell | emc cx200 storage unit
only 30 max concurrent users
using:
sort_area_size$M
hash_area_sizeHM
pga_aggregate_target=0
with a 1.5 GB buffer cache.
(did not yet kick the tires on indirect_buffers)
large memory support does work in 9.2.0.4, as you have
already found out.
can you move your buffer cache up to indirect address
space, and use the memory below 3 GB for the PGA?
hth.
Pd
> "Koivu, Lisa" <Lisa.Koivu@(protected)>
> Sent by: oracle-l-bounce@(protected)
> 02/06/2004 01:38 PM
> Please respond to oracle-l
>
>
> To: <oracle-l@(protected)>
> cc:
> Subject: ORA-4030 (See http://ORA-4030.ora-code.com)
>
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> 9204, Windows 2003 Enterprise
>
> ORA-04030 (See http://ORA-04030.ora-code.com): out of process memory when trying to
> allocate 49676 bytes
> (hash-join subh,kllcqas:kllsltba)
>
> What fun. Yes, I know this means it is out of
> memory. I know that hash
> joins are memory-intensive. I want to allow the db
> to utilize more
> memory. Using hash joins speeds up the data loads.
>
> I have pga_aggregate_target set to 900m (due to a
> bug). I decreased the
> amount of memory allocated to the sga and the db
> block buffers as
> indicated in note 116076.1. Yes I know it's about
> NT, but I'm grasping
> here.
>
> I watched the memory allocation ramp up on the
> server while Informatica
> was running. It gets to around 2.1, 2.2 gb and
> doesn't go any farther.
> Jobs begin failing.
>
> Our sysadmin says there's no problem with w2003E
> addressing more than
> 2GB contiguous memory, like the note says. However,
> the behavior was
> pretty suspect.
>
> Any windows people that can point me in the right
> direction?
>
> This was brought on by setting the optimizer_goal
> for this user to
> choose. We set it back to first_rows and this error
> does not occur.
> This makes sense to me, however I really want to see
> the db use
> available resources instead of barf.
>
>
> Lisa Koivu
> Senior DBA, yea right
> Orlando, FL, USA
__ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ______
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Finance: Get your refund fast by filing online.
http://taxes.yahoo.com/filing.html
-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ------
Please see the official ORACLE-L FAQ: http://www.orafaq.com
-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ------
To unsubscribe send email to: oracle-l-request@(protected)
put 'unsubscribe' in the subject line.
--
Archives are at http://www.freelists.org/archives/oracle-l/
FAQ is at http://www.freelists.org/help/fom-serve/cache/1.html
-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --
|
|
|