Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Oracle List - by freelists.org
Oracle on SUSE Linux - Runing Oracle on SUSE Linux
Oracle database error code ...
www.freelists.org
Subjects
ORA 12540: TNS:internal limit restriction exceeded
ORA 12838 please : Is possible to append two times to the same table befo
ORA 12838 please : Is possible to append two times to the same table before
ora 04031
ora 12500 on windows
ORA 32004: obsolete and/or deprecated parameter(s) specified
ORA 01925: maximum of 30 enabled roles exceeded
ORA 01925: maximum of 30 enabled roles exceeded
ora 12500 on windows
ORA 01650, one idea
ORA 01650
ORA 4030
ORA 12838 please : Is possible to append two times to thesametable before do
ORA 12838 please : Is possible to append two times to thesame table before d
ORA 01536
ORA 03113 end of file on communication channel
ORA 32004: obsolete and/or deprecated parameter(s) specified
ORA 00600:
ORA 00020: maximum number of processes (%s) exceeded
ORA 01925: maximum of 30 enabled roles exceeded
ORA 3113 while creating a cluster database 9201 RAC on Linux with OCFS
ora 12500 on windows
ora 12500 on windows
ora 12500 on windows
ORA 01650, one idea
ora 12500 on windows
ora 12500 on windows
ora 12500 on windows
ORA 2000 Error Using DBMS STATS GATHER SCHEMA STATS
ORA 01650, one idea
ORA 01650, one idea
ORA 01650, one idea
ORA 01650
ORA 01650
ORA 01031
ORA 4030
ORA 4030
ORA 06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: Bulk Bind: Truncated Bind
ORA 01722 invalid number
 
High mbrc in aux_stats$

High mbrc in aux_stats$

2006-03-12       - By oracle-l-bounce@(protected)

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9  

Ciao Luca

>On a related note, Oracle 10gR2 has changed the default value on
>db_file_multiblock_read_count to match the system I/O max size (on my
>test Linux DBs with 8K block I ended up with
>db_file_multiblock_read_count=128).

Attention, it is not the max I/O size, it is, according to the reference guide,
the "maximum I/O size that can be efficiently performed". It seams not that
different... in reality it is!

>Oracle's documentation seems to me somewhat cryptic on this. First they
>say:
>
>"Even though the default value may be a large value, the optimizer will
>not favor large plans if you do not set this parameter. It would do so
>only if you explicitly set this parameter to a large value."

This is because in 10gR2 either MBRC (system statistics) or a default value (8)
is used.

>...any thoughts/experiences on using the default value for
>db_file_multiblock_read_count on 10gR2?

DON'T USE IT. Presently the "auto-tuned" value is not dependent on performance
figures but only on a couple of other parameters.


HTH
Chris
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l