Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Oracle List - by freelists.org
Oracle on SUSE Linux - Runing Oracle on SUSE Linux
Oracle database error code ...
www.freelists.org
Subjects
ORA 12540: TNS:internal limit restriction exceeded
ORA 12838 please : Is possible to append two times to the same table befo
ORA 12838 please : Is possible to append two times to the same table before
ora 04031
ora 12500 on windows
ORA 32004: obsolete and/or deprecated parameter(s) specified
ORA 01925: maximum of 30 enabled roles exceeded
ORA 01925: maximum of 30 enabled roles exceeded
ora 12500 on windows
ORA 01650, one idea
ORA 01650
ORA 4030
ORA 12838 please : Is possible to append two times to thesametable before do
ORA 12838 please : Is possible to append two times to thesame table before d
ORA 01536
ORA 03113 end of file on communication channel
ORA 32004: obsolete and/or deprecated parameter(s) specified
ORA 00600:
ORA 00020: maximum number of processes (%s) exceeded
ORA 01925: maximum of 30 enabled roles exceeded
ORA 3113 while creating a cluster database 9201 RAC on Linux with OCFS
ora 12500 on windows
ora 12500 on windows
ora 12500 on windows
ORA 01650, one idea
ora 12500 on windows
ora 12500 on windows
ora 12500 on windows
ORA 2000 Error Using DBMS STATS GATHER SCHEMA STATS
ORA 01650, one idea
ORA 01650, one idea
ORA 01650, one idea
ORA 01650
ORA 01650
ORA 01031
ORA 4030
ORA 4030
ORA 06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: Bulk Bind: Truncated Bind
ORA 01722 invalid number
 
High mbrc in aux_stats$

High mbrc in aux_stats$

2006-03-13       - By oracle-l-bounce@(protected)

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3     4     5     6     7     8     9  

Ciao Luca

>Thanks for you reply. If I get your comment right, you think that the
>"auto tuned" value may be incorrect (too large). As far as I can see the
>autotuned value makes a lot of sense for sequential IO. I use ASM, which
>stripes and datafiles into 1 MB Allocation Units, so when Oracle sets
>the default db_file_multiblock_read_count * db_block_size =1MB, it looks
>to me as a good idea.

Large I/O size is not always good for performance. Since I expect that such a
feature finds out what the optimal I/O size is, the 10.2.0.1 implementation
makes no sense.

>Indeed I see very good sequential IO performances
>with this test system (10.2.0.2).

Presently I didn't test it with 10.2.0.2.

>One problem there, if any, may be with the optimizer favoring too much
>full scans. I didn't understand your comment 'in 10gR2 either MBRC
>(system statistics) or a default value (8) is used'. Do you mean that
>the CBO makes the decision at run time and independently for each query?

With system statistics without workload the CBO uses a fixed value (which in my
tests was always 8) instead of the auto-tuned db_file_multiblock_read_count.

With system statistics with workload the CBO uses MBRC from AUX_STATS$.

>Do you have more details on this new feature?

Not really. Some observations I did, but they remains observations... It makes
little sense to speak about them...


HTH
Chris
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l