RE: Advisable 9.2.0.? Oracle Patch on Solaris 9 ?

8.1.7.4 was a very stable release. Ahh, the good old days.

From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Schultz, Charles
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 10:08 AM
To: VIVEK_SHARMA@infosys.com; Oracle-L
Subject: RE: Advisable 9.2.0.? Oracle Patch on Solaris 9 ?

This brings up a good question that many of us in our shop have been wondering. How does one define "most stable"? Inherently with new features (and new bug fixes), there are bound to be new problems, which decreases stability. It has been our experience that our 8.1.7.4 database has been more "stable" than 9.2.0.6 (we gave up on 9.2.0.7 and the rumored 9.2.0.8).

From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of VIVEK_SHARMA
Sent: Monday, April 24, 2006 2:53 AM
To: Oracle-L
Subject: Advisable 9.2.0.? Oracle Patch on Solaris 9 ?

Considering Migrating a BIG Production Server from Oracle 8i to 9i

Is 9.2.0.”7” (64 Bit) the most advisable/stable patch on Solaris 9?

Thanks Folks

**************** CAUTION - Disclaimer *****************
This e-mail contains PRIVILEGED AND CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION intended solely for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the intended recipient, please notify the sender by e-mail and delete the original message. Further, you are not to copy, disclose, or distribute this e-mail or its contents to any other person and any such actions are unlawful. This e-mail may contain viruses. Infosys has taken every reasonable precaution to minimize this risk, but is not liable for any damage you may sustain as a result of any virus in this e-mail. You should carry out your own virus checks before opening the e-mail or attachment. Infosys reserves the right to monitor and review the content of all messages sent to or from this e-mail address. Messages sent to or from this e-mail address may be stored on the Infosys e-mail system.
***INFOSYS******** End of Disclaimer ********INFOSYS***

RE: Advisable 9.2.0.? Oracle Patch on Solaris 9 ?

Mercadante, Thomas F

2006-04-24