One more idiotic decision in Novell (even if it is not true, it had PR
effect). ReiserFS was one of distinctive things in it (and no one prevents
from allowing to choose default fs).

if not reiserFS, then why theyy abandoned (almost) xfs?

I can understand, if Linux incorporate zfs, and then drop support for
ReiserFS, But not as it looks now.

So.

KDE. YOU. REISERFS.

What is next?

LINUX?

----- Original Message -----
From: "Didier Boiteux" <dboiteux@(protected)>
To: <suse-oracle@(protected)>
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 1:57 AM
Subject: Re: [suse-oracle] SLES 9 SP3 + Oracle 9.2.0.6 + SATA = data block
corruption


> Hi,
>
> You wrote:
> >As of October 2006, there are no plans to support it officially in the
> future.
> That is a miscommunication (maybe in favor of the in-house ocfs?) . It
will
> not be installed by default on SLES11 but still supported even on SLES11.
It
> will still be the default on SLES9/10.
>
> This link is part of the whole document about this filesystem default
change:
> see the FAQ on
> http://www.novell.com/linux/filesystems/
>
>
> -+-
> Didier
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, email: suse-oracle-unsubscribe@(protected)
> For additional commands, email: suse-oracle-help@(protected)
> Please see http://www.suse.com/oracle/ before posting
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, email: suse-oracle-unsubscribe@(protected)
For additional commands, email: suse-oracle-help@(protected)
Please see http://www.suse.com/oracle/ before posting