I am running OCFSv2 in production in 2 month, and in staging for approx 6
month. While it is stable in _normal_ conditions, failure tests shows, that
it don't survive many failure scenarios (causing all servers to reboot, or
switching to readonly mode). So, it is not a simple choice - use it or not.

But it's true - current OCFS is much more stable, esp. in SLES9 SP3 (and
updated kernels).

----- Original Message -----
From: "Silviu Marin-Caea" <silviu_marin-caea@(protected)>
To: <suse-oracle@(protected)>
Sent: Thursday, January 04, 2007 10:22 PM
Subject: Re: [suse-oracle] re: Possibly migrating from Solaris to Suse + ASM
???


> On Wednesday 03 January 2007 23:26, Alexei_Roudnev wrote:
> > You have not other choice in case of RAC (OCFSv2 is not
> > stable enough for the primary database;
>
> We've been running with OCFS2 in production for almost a year. While we
had
> some very nasty problems at the beginning, there were all gone after
> upgrading to OCFS2 1.2.1. And now the SUSE kernel has 1.2.3. So OCFS2 is
a
> choice.
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, email: suse-oracle-unsubscribe@(protected)
> For additional commands, email: suse-oracle-help@(protected)
> Please see http://www.suse.com/oracle/ before posting
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, email: suse-oracle-unsubscribe@(protected)
For additional commands, email: suse-oracle-help@(protected)
Please see http://www.suse.com/oracle/ before posting