Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Oracle List - by freelists.org
Oracle on SUSE Linux - Runing Oracle on SUSE Linux
Oracle database error code ...
www.freelists.org
Subjects
ORA 12540: TNS:internal limit restriction exceeded
ORA 12838 please : Is possible to append two times to the same table befo
ORA 12838 please : Is possible to append two times to the same table before
ora 04031
ora 12500 on windows
ORA 32004: obsolete and/or deprecated parameter(s) specified
ORA 01925: maximum of 30 enabled roles exceeded
ORA 01925: maximum of 30 enabled roles exceeded
ora 12500 on windows
ORA 01650, one idea
ORA 01650
ORA 4030
ORA 12838 please : Is possible to append two times to thesametable before do
ORA 12838 please : Is possible to append two times to thesame table before d
ORA 01536
ORA 03113 end of file on communication channel
ORA 32004: obsolete and/or deprecated parameter(s) specified
ORA 00600:
ORA 00020: maximum number of processes (%s) exceeded
ORA 01925: maximum of 30 enabled roles exceeded
ORA 3113 while creating a cluster database 9201 RAC on Linux with OCFS
ora 12500 on windows
ora 12500 on windows
ora 12500 on windows
ORA 01650, one idea
ora 12500 on windows
ora 12500 on windows
ora 12500 on windows
ORA 2000 Error Using DBMS STATS GATHER SCHEMA STATS
ORA 01650, one idea
ORA 01650, one idea
ORA 01650, one idea
ORA 01650
ORA 01650
ORA 01031
ORA 4030
ORA 4030
ORA 06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: Bulk Bind: Truncated Bind
ORA 01722 invalid number
 
AW: [suse-oracle] Novell - it is VERY SERIOUS! We shouldadvise against using

AW: [suse-oracle] Novell - it is VERY SERIOUS! We shouldadvise against using

2007-01-09       - By Arun Singh

 Back
Hi Frank,

I can understand the frustration here as I am following this in the
bugzilla. You are right in asserting the complexity of the bug.

Regards,
Arun

>>> On 1/9/2007 at 11:11 AM, "Frank Westheider"
<frank.westheider@(protected)>
wrote:
> Hi Arun,
>
> Sorry...but cool down is not an option.
>
> We have this bug on 3 machines since beginning of september (!!!) and
opened
> novell and oracle support-cases....without any success/effort.
>
> We escalated these cases at novell and got 2 kernel-ptf-fixes...we
tested
> both and diffed the ptf-kernel-source with the original buggy
> kernel-source...and even we saw, that the difference were not
concerning the
> aio-kernel-part.
>
> We can reproduce the problem (and wrote this to the support too) with
heavy
> async-io-load over a duration of several days (batch-processes). So i
think,
> this would be possible to Novell/Oracle/the kernel-guys as well with
simple
> db-jobs using aio and firing until the aio-bug is shown....
>
> Head-shaking about the support...beginning of september and no really
effort
> to fix this thing. I hope you know, what aio is doing for really
busy
> databases...
>
> Frank
>
> -- --Urspr?ngliche Nachricht-- --
> Von: Arun Singh [mailto:Arun.Singh@(protected)]
> Gesendet: Dienstag, 9. Januar 2007 16:34
> An: suse-oracle@(protected)
> Betreff: RE: [suse-oracle] Novell - it is VERY SERIOUS! We
shouldadvise
> against using SuSe and Oracle if suc
>
> Cool down folks. Do any of you have any easy way to trigger this
kernel bug?
> I can promise fix will take no time, If we can find a way to simulate
this
> bug internally. SUSE support/kernel team is aware of the seriousness
of this
> bug.
>
> -Arun
>
>
>
>>>> On 1/9/2007 at 1:16 AM, "Yoav Givon" <YGivon@(protected)> wrote:
>> I strongly support you Alexei on this one.  This is not very
business
>> like and I believe Novell Officials should make some strong
commitment
>> here other wise  they will loose us . Loud and Clear.
>>
>> Yoav Givon  
>>
>> -- --Original Message-- --
>> From: Alexei_Roudnev [mailto:Alexei_Roudnev@(protected)]
>> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 10:40 PM
>> To: Anton Dischner; Didier Boiteux
>> Cc: SuSE MailingList
>> Subject: [suse-oracle] Novell - it is VERY SERIOUS! We should
advise
>> against using SuSe and Oracle if such bugs are not fixed PROMPTLY!!
Re:
>> AW: [suse-oracle] kernel bug
>>
>> This is a critical bug - why it takes so long to fix it?
>>
>> Novell is not primary Linux in Oracle (it is not tested with it
>> automatically by internal users, as they do with RHEL4.4), so it
makes
>> a very important to fix such problems ASAP when they arise!)
>>
>>
>> -- -- Original Message -- --
>> From: "Anton Dischner" <Anton.Dischner@(protected)>
>> To: "Didier Boiteux" <dboiteux@(protected)>
>> Cc: "SuSE MailingList" <suse-oracle@(protected)>
>> Sent: Monday, January 08, 2007 12:54 AM
>> Subject: Re: AW: [suse-oracle] kernel bug
>>
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> we had a kernel crash with a system which had the last kernel
patches
>>> installed.
>>>
>>> Kernel 2.6.5-7.283 did -not- fix the kernel BUG at fs/aio.c:733
>>> with bug number 165140
>>>
>>> regards,
>>>
>>> Toni
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
+-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --+
>>> | Anton Dischner, Unix admin, Oracle-DBA    Phone: +49 89
70953202|
>>> | Institut fuer Klinische Chemie            Fax  : +49 89
70958888|
>>> | Klinikum Grosshadern                      Home : +49 89
69708766|
>>> | Ludwig Maximilians Universitaet Muenchen  Mobil: +49 172
8388880|
>>> | 81366 Muenchen Germany                                        
|
>>> | Marchioninistr. 15    Anton.Dischner"at"med.uni-muenchen.de    
|
>>>
+-- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- ---- --+
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> To unsubscribe, email: suse-oracle-unsubscribe@(protected)
>>> For additional commands, email: suse-oracle-help@(protected)
>>> Please see http://www.suse.com/oracle/ before posting
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
>




--
To unsubscribe, email: suse-oracle-unsubscribe@(protected)
For additional commands, email: suse-oracle-help@(protected)
Please see http://www.suse.com/oracle/ before posting