Java Mailing List Archive

http://www.dba.5341.com/

Home » Home (12/2007) » suse oracle »

Re: [suse-oracle] Suse 10 vs SUN E4500 - ORION io tool does not match
iostat output

Peter Santos

2007-04-18

Replies:

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Kevin,
 does it matter how the filesystem is mounted?
 After all I'm giving ORION a device name called /dev/dsk/c5t0d0s0. Does it matter what/how
 a filesystem is mounted on that device?

 The /etc/vfstab tells me that the device is mounted like this:

 device        device        mount  FS    fsck   mount   mount
 #to mount      to fsck        point  type   pass   at boot options
 /dev/dsk/c5t0d0s0     /dev/rdsk/c5t0d0s0    /z2   vxfs   2     yes   -


- -peter



Kevin Closson wrote:
> Is one buffered and the other not? Perhaps if you mount the 4500
> filesystem with -forcedirectio to see what that does ?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Santos [mailto:psantos@(protected)]
> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2007 1:25 PM
> To: suse-oracle@(protected)
> Subject: [suse-oracle] Suse 10 vs SUN E4500 - ORION io tool does not
> match iostat output
>
> Folks,
>
> I'm wondering if someone can help me understand the output of oracle's
> ORION I/O calibration tool.
> I'm comparing a SuSE 10 Dell 6800 /IBM DS4400 (4 dual core Xeon 2.60GHz)
>         vs Solaris 5.8 E4500/IBM DS4400 (12 x 400Mhz cpus).
>
> Both the devices used are a RAID 10 configuration of 24 x 36GB 15000 rpm
> drives.
>
> I've made sure the controllers are setup the same, and tested only small
> random reads (8k reads).
> The problem I have is that the IOPS rate for the Solaris machine is much
> greater than Suse, but when I compare
> iostat outputs it shows that the SuSe throughput is far better... which
> is what I expect, since the E4500 is a 10yr+
> machine with slower bus speeds.
>
> I'm trying to understand why the results are conflicting, and/or if this
> is just a reporting issue by Orion and/or
> iostat differences between Sun/SuSe. You will notice below that ORION
> reports the IOPS for the Sun test at
> 29,462 vs 2,539, but the iostat output shows differently.
>
> Does anyone have an idea of why the ORION IOPS does not match up with
> the iostat output on the Sun test?
>
> -peter
>
>
>
> iostat on linux
> ===============
>
> Device:   r/s rsec/s   rkB/s  avgrq-sz avgqu-sz await svctm %util
> sde   2519.20 40307.20 20153.60 16.00   55.85   22.10 0.40 99.80
> sde   2527.07 40433.17 20216.58 16.00   56.87   22.52 0.40 99.86
> sde   2535.10 40561.60 20280.80 16.00   56.92   22.47 0.39 99.96
> sde   2534.70 40555.20 20277.60 16.00   56.92   22.37 0.39 99.96
> sde   2534.80 40556.80 20278.40 16.00   56.93   22.51 0.39 99.96
> sde   2539.16 40626.57 20313.29 16.00   59.87   23.49 0.39 99.86
> sde   2523.50 40376.00 20188.00 16.00   56.93   22.45 0.40 99.96
> sde   2508.10 40129.60 20064.80 16.00   58.72   23.47 0.40 99.80
> sde   2517.90 40286.40 20143.20 16.00   59.92   23.79 0.40 99.96
> sde   2528.10 40449.60 20224.80 16.00   59.93   23.71 0.40 99.96
>
> ORION report: Maximum Small IOPS=2539 @ Small=48
>
> iostat on Sun
> ==============
>
>  r/s   kr/s wait actv asvc_t %w %b device
> 559.4  4475.2  0.0 0.2   0.4  0 22 sd225
> 575.4  4603.2  0.0 0.3   0.4  0 23 sd225
> 568.7  4549.5  0.0 0.2   0.4  0 22 sd225
> 578.9  4631.2  0.0 0.3   0.4  0 23 sd225
> 528.9  4226.5  0.0 0.2   0.4  0 21 sd225
> 537.9  4303.2  0.0 0.2   0.4  0 21 sd225
> 533.4  4267.2  0.0 0.2   0.4  0 21 sd225
> 546.5  4372.0  0.0 0.2   0.4  0 21 sd225
>
>
> ORION report: Maximum Small IOPS=29462 @ Small=48
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGJoHzoyy5QBCjoT0RAnXeAJ9AVzgc+gVh9hS2jXaK4prGx4boQACeNPXK
5PuKty+QHovEm+l5joiDqGA=
=/cEO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--
To unsubscribe, email: suse-oracle-unsubscribe@(protected)
For additional commands, email: suse-oracle-help@(protected)
Please see http://www.suse.com/oracle/ before posting

©2008 dba.5341.com - Jax Systems, LLC, U.S.A.