Java Mailing List Archive

http://www.dba.5341.com/

Home » Home (12/2007) » oracle-l »

RE: os cache vs. db cache

Bobak, Mark

2007-07-09

Replies:

Hi Robyn,

 

This is pretty dated, but still accurate, I think:

http://www.ixora.com.au/tips/avoid_buffered_io.htm

 

-Mark

 

--
Mark J. Bobak

Senior Database Administrator, System & Product Technologies
ProQuest
789 E. Eisenhower, Parkway, P.O. Box 1346
Ann Arbor MI 48106-1346
734.997.4059  or 800.521.0600 x 4059
mark.bobak@il.proquest.com
www.proquest.com
www.csa.com

ProQuest...Start here.

 

From: oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@freelists.org] On Behalf Of Robyn
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2007 2:04 PM
To: oracle-l
Subject: os cache vs. db cache

 

Hello everyone,

Over the years, I've read differing opinions on balancing the os cache and the database cache.  Seems like I remember there were some advocates for minimizing the os cache and maximizing the database cache to allow Oracle to better determine which blocks should truly be cached and avoid necessary blocks being cached because they were in proximity to hot data.  I also have heard opposite opinions.

I'm specifically focused on performance for a data warehouse.  Has anyone tested performance with a minimized OS cache and a maximized database cache?  If so, what were the results?  Does anyone have a really good paper or book on the topic?  I'm trying to collect some information before I start discussions with the platforms guys.

tia ... Robyn

©2008 dba.5341.com - Jax Systems, LLC, U.S.A.