11g Windows 2007-11-02 - By Derya Oktay
Back
Hello Niall,
I also installed 11g, on windows 2003 sp2 machine running on vmware esx with
1 CPU and 1 GB. And I experienced no problems.
Regards,
Derya.
On 10/31/07, Andre van Winssen <dreveewee@(protected)> wrote:
>
> Hi Niall,
>
> I installed 11g for windows couple of times already on windows2003 32 bit
> without any problem during or after the installation and db creation (single
> instance). One server was an ESX windows guest (2VCPU/2GB), the other two
> were physical servers with 4 and 8 CPU's
>
> No complaints sofar, have logged two SR's sofar. A support analyst was
> still thinking that 11.1.0.6 is BETA, another one overruled him that this
> version is production software.
>
> DBControl has some nice improvements
>
> Regards,
> Andre
>
>
> 2007/10/30, Niall Litchfield <niall.litchfield@(protected)>:
> >
> > List
> >
> > I've now made two attempts to install 11g on this dell laptop (2gb ram
> > 1700mhz processor) the second having wiped all previous traces of Oracle
> > from the machine. Both times the software installs fine, creating a custom
> > db works fine, but then the CPU hogs at 100% for hours (I've left this
> > overnight in case it was some em madness and come back to 11 hours of cpu
> > usage in a 15 hour period!) Has anyone else experienced this? Right now 11g
> > is leaving a bad taste in my mouth.
> >
> > --
> > Niall Litchfield
> > Oracle DBA
> > http://www.orawin.info
> >
>
>
Hello Niall,<br><br>I also installed 11g, on windows 2003 sp2 machine running
on vmware esx with 1 CPU and 1 GB. And I experienced no problems.<br><br
>Regards,<br>Derya.<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 10/31/07, <b class=
"gmail_sendername">
Andre van Winssen</b> <<a href="mailto:dreveewee@(protected)">dreveewee@(protected)
.com</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left:
1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>Hi Niall,</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I installed 11g for windows couple of times already on windows2003 32 bit
without any problem during or after the installation and db creation (single
instance). One server was an ESX windows guest (2VCPU/2GB), the other two were
physical servers with 4 and 8 CPU's
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>No complaints sofar, have logged two SR's sofar. A support
analyst was still thinking that <a href="http://11.1.0.6" target="_blank"
onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window,event,this)">11.1.0.6</a> is
BETA, another one overruled him that this version is production software.
</div>
<div> </div>
<div>DBControl has some nice improvements</div>
<div> </div>
<div>Regards,</div>
<div>Andre<br><br> </div>
<div><span class="gmail_quote">2007/10/30, Niall Litchfield <<a href="mailto
:niall.litchfield@(protected)" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink
(window,event,this)">niall.litchfield@(protected)</a>>:</span>
<div><span class="e" id="q_115f34c19e697b99_1"><blockquote class="gmail_quote"
style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0px 0px 0px 0.8ex;
padding-left: 1ex;">
<div>List</div>
<div> </div>
<div>I've now made two attempts to install 11g on this dell laptop (2gb ram
1700mhz processor) the second having wiped all previous traces of Oracle from
the machine. Both times the software installs fine, creating a custom db works
fine, but then the CPU hogs at 100% for hours (I've left this overnight in
case it was some em madness and come back to 11 hours of cpu usage in a 15 hour
period!) Has anyone else experienced this? Right now 11g is leaving a
bad taste in my mouth.
<br clear="all"><br>-- <br>Niall Litchfield<br>Oracle DBA<br><a href="http:/
/www.orawin.info/" target="_blank" onclick="return top.js.OpenExtLink(window
,event,this)">http://www.orawin.info</a> </div></blockquote></span></div>
</div><br>
</blockquote></div><br>
|
|
