Mailing List
Home
Forum Home
Oracle List - by freelists.org
Oracle on SUSE Linux - Runing Oracle on SUSE Linux
Oracle database error code ...
www.freelists.org
Subjects
ORA 12540: TNS:internal limit restriction exceeded
ORA 12838 please : Is possible to append two times to the same table befo
ORA 12838 please : Is possible to append two times to the same table before
ora 04031
ora 12500 on windows
ORA 32004: obsolete and/or deprecated parameter(s) specified
ORA 01925: maximum of 30 enabled roles exceeded
ORA 01925: maximum of 30 enabled roles exceeded
ora 12500 on windows
ORA 01650, one idea
ORA 01650
ORA 4030
ORA 12838 please : Is possible to append two times to thesametable before do
ORA 12838 please : Is possible to append two times to thesame table before d
ORA 01536
ORA 03113 end of file on communication channel
ORA 32004: obsolete and/or deprecated parameter(s) specified
ORA 00600:
ORA 00020: maximum number of processes (%s) exceeded
ORA 01925: maximum of 30 enabled roles exceeded
ORA 3113 while creating a cluster database 9201 RAC on Linux with OCFS
ora 12500 on windows
ora 12500 on windows
ora 12500 on windows
ORA 01650, one idea
ora 12500 on windows
ora 12500 on windows
ora 12500 on windows
ORA 2000 Error Using DBMS STATS GATHER SCHEMA STATS
ORA 01650, one idea
ORA 01650, one idea
ORA 01650, one idea
ORA 01650
ORA 01650
Subject: ora 01031
ORA 4030
ORA 4030
ORA 06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: Bulk Bind: Truncated Bind
Subject: Re: ORA 01722 invalid number
 
Adding CPU to a unix box--added capacity.

Adding CPU to a unix box--added capacity.

2007-11-03       - By Alex Gorbachev

 Back
Reply:     1     2     3     4     5  

In addition to my previous reply and to what David shared, I can
mention result of one project with our client where we did a benchmark
of CPUs migrating from double core Santa Rosa to quad core Barcelona.
Single core of Barcelona was slower (we had one of the first chips I
think... something like 1.6 or 1.8 GHz). We calculated new and old
capacity purely based on number of cores and GHz and we had 60%
increase in capacity.

We used TPC-C traffic and we did see increase of throughput on the
same level. However, TPC-C transactions are very simplistic and
usually far from real-life transactions.

On Nov 3, 2007 7:14 PM, Best, David <David.Best@(protected)> wrote:
>
>
> A while back we doubled the number of cpu's in a system from 2 to 4.    I
> monitored CPU usage at 5 minute intervals for the week before and the week
> after.
>
> For the 4cpu week the average CPU usage was: 26.39815
>
> For the 2cpu week the average CPU usage was: 54.78056
>
> So,  CPU usage pretty much halved which was what we expected.  However, that
> doesn't necessarily mean performance will increase by a factor of 2.  It
> depends on the application.  In this case the databases on this server were
> a mix of OLTP and Datamarts.   The OLTP databases did see an improvement but
> the datamarts didn't.  The reason is that OLTP transactions are normally
> short and sweet, so more could be processed at a given time.   In the case
> of the datamart, the refresh job didn't take advantage of multiple cpu's, so
> it still took the same amount of time to complete.
>
>  __ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____ ____
>
> From: oracle-l-bounce@(protected) [mailto:oracle-l-bounce@(protected)]
> On Behalf Of Zhu,Chao
> Sent: Friday, November 02, 2007 10:32 AM
>
> To: oracle-l
> Subject: Adding CPU to a unix box--added capacity.
>
>
>
> hi,
>     Does anyone have experience on adding new CPU to a existing box, like
> upgrade from 8CPU to 16 CPU for example.
>     I am curious about two things;
> 1. How many CPU usage% drop do we expect? Like previously it is running at
> 50% CPU usage,  typically will it drop to 25%? or something like 30%? To ask
> the same question from another view, is , how much capacity we add to the
> box? 16CPU box = 1.X(?) of a 8CPU box. Assuming same archtecture/OS. (same
> cpu count server in different architecture may have different processing
> power?)
>   Would be nice if you can share with your experience (like on
> solaris/aix/hp etc). That's kind of typical server scalability.
>
> 2.   Can we say,  CPU_USED_BY_THIS_SESSION (stat in oracle) ~~
> Unix_CPU_COUNT * USER_MODE_CPU% (vmstat usr column)? I did couple of compare
> in my database, they look pretty close.
>
>     Does anyone ever thinking about have such a formular: it could be very
> fun.
> CPU_USED_BY_THIS_SESSION = X*logical_reads + Y*physical_reads + Z*sorts + A
> * executions + B * redo_size + C * Latch_Spins+ .......?
>
> by the way, anyone like the book"forecasting oracle performance"?
> --
> Regards
> Zhu Chao
> www.cnoug.org
>



--
Alex Gorbachev, Oracle DBA Brewer, The Pythian Group
http://www.pythian.com/blogs/author/alex http://www.oracloid.com
BAAG party - www.BattleAgainstAnyGuess.com
--
http://www.freelists.org/webpage/oracle-l